In both experiments, differences in processing arise both between inferential techniques themselves, and at subsequent panels allowing the bridging inference to be resolved. Experiment 1 directly compared five distinct types, and Experiment 2 explored the effect of combining techniques. Here, we examine whether processing and inference resolution differ across inferential techniques in two self-paced reading experiments. These techniques implicitly express the unseen event while balancing several underlying features that describe their informativeness. Most previous work on visual narrative inferencing has focused on fully omitted events, yet few have compared inference generation when climactic events become replaced with a panel employing numerous inferential techniques (e.g., action stars or onomatopoeia). ![]() The ability to reconstruct a missing event to create a coherent interpretation – bridging inference – is central to understanding both real-world events and visual narratives like comics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |